A little Internet research with topics like X-Trans worms, watercolor effect, LR, and Adobe should bring up some tens of thousands of pages for you to examine (somewhat contentious and the amount of misinformation you will encounter is massive). What you're missing is better rendition of fine detail from your XT-2 raw files.
#Rawtherapee vs iridient developer for fuji raw software#
When I first got the Fujifilm X t2 I made and compared images from the Raw files converted with the Fujifilm software and those files converted with the Adobe DNG Converter and did not notice any difference in the output quality, so I am curious why the users are using the other available conversion software? but after reading about conversion on this forum, I would like to know what I am missing by not using the converters usually discussed. So my current workflow is to convert my RAF files to DNG and I am happy with the results. The DNG ,being a universal file format gave me confidence that it will be around. My previous system was Pentax and I shot in Adobe DNG with satisfactory results. Since I still use stand alone Photoshop CS-6 it will also not open my Raw Files. I used the DXO prime noise reduction when needed.
I use the JPEG most of the time since they are outstanding.Īfter communicating with DXO on why they don't support the XT they basically said it was because of the X tran sensor and their algorithms are designed for the Bayer array.
I have been shooting Fuji X (T-2) for about 18 month and generally shoot Raw +.
0 kommentar(er)
